Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(enums): Add link to chapter on pattern syntax #242

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 25, 2019
Merged

fix(enums): Add link to chapter on pattern syntax #242

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 25, 2019

Conversation

jensim
Copy link
Contributor

@jensim jensim commented Nov 24, 2019

After being stuck on exercise enums3.rs for about an hour or two, having read the entire chapter on enums 2-3 times, and still being unable to complete the exercise, i started broadening my reading. I finally found the answer in the rust docs via google.

After being stuck on exercise enums3.rs for about an hour or two, having read the entire chapter on enums 2-3 times, and still being unable to complete the exercise, i started broadening my reading. I finally found the answer in the rust docs via google.
Copy link
Member

@shadows-withal shadows-withal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@shadows-withal shadows-withal changed the title Add link to chapter on pattern syntax fix(enums): Add link to chapter on pattern syntax Nov 25, 2019
@shadows-withal shadows-withal merged commit 615ce32 into rust-lang:master Nov 25, 2019
pedantic79 pushed a commit to pedantic79/rustlings that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2020
ppp3 pushed a commit to ppp3/rustlings that referenced this pull request May 23, 2022
dmoore04 pushed a commit to dmoore04/rustlings that referenced this pull request Sep 11, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants